[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: How big are your customisations?
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: How big are your customisations? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:33:35 +0300 |
> From: "Davin Pearson" <davin.pearson@gmail.com>
> Date: 28 Jul 2006 02:56:06 -0700
>
> Then I changed the command M-c to behave
> like so aaa_bbb_ccc -> Aaa_Bbb_Ccc
> for more readable C++ code.
3 M-c's in a row will do that without any changes.
> Then I (re)defined all of the function
> keys to perform common operations
> like f8 to undo and f9 to compile.
Function keys are too far away, so I dislike them.
> emacs-dialect--dosemacs-p
> emacs-dialect--xemacs-p
> emacs-dialect--gnuemacs-p
For the last two, (featurep 'emacs) etc. will do. So I don't see why
these are needed, they aren't shorter than the above.
> os-type--microsoft-p
> os-type--linux-p
> os-type--mswindows-p
> os-type--msdos-p
> os-type--graphical-p
> os-type--text-p
For the last two, use display-graphic-p. (There are more display-*-p
predicates that you may wish looking into.)
> Wouldn't it be good if similar
> functions were available as
> standard commands, since
> they are so useful?
The OS predicates are very simple: (eq system-type 'foo).
> http://www.geocities.com/davinpearson/research/2006/mopa2e.html
I looked at this, and there are some features that seem to be part of
Emacs:
ebrowse.el is the Emacs C++ class browser
which-func.el shows the current function in the mode line
Why don't you use these?
- Formatting output [was: How big are your customisations?], (continued)
Re: How big are your customisations?, Dieter Wilhelm, 2006/07/28
Message not available
Re: How big are your customisations?, robert . thorpe, 2006/07/28