[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux"
|
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
|
Subject: |
Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" |
|
Date: |
Fri, 29 Dec 2006 19:35:46 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.92 (gnu/linux) |
nospam@dev.null (Alexey Pustyntsev) writes:
> "Micha Feigin" <michf@post.tau.ac.il> writes:
>
>> The operating system is the kernel. GNU is one of the more popular option
>> (but
>> not the only one) for the tools running over the operating system. I think
>> GNU/Linux is just RMS being overly pushy and and egomaniac.
>>
>
> RMS is neither pushy nor egomaniac. 'GNU/Linux' is absolutely correct
> and fair term as the GNU tools and the kernel are practically
> indispensable to get the OS running.
And in particular the GNU C compiler and libraries!
--
Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, (continued)
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Peter Dyballa, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Sven Bretfeld, 2006/12/27
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ramprasad, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/28
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Tim X, 2006/12/28
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Leo, 2006/12/28
- "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), B. Smith-Mannschott, 2006/12/29
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Micha Feigin, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux", Alexey Pustyntsev, 2006/12/29
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux",
Kim F. Storm <=
- RE: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Gian Uberto Lauri, 2006/12/29
- Message not available
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Robert Thorpe, 2006/12/30
- Re: "MIT/GNU/Linux" (was: gnu vs. xemacs), Matthew Flaschen, 2006/12/30
- Message not available
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Hadron Quark, 2006/12/29
- Re: gnu vs. xemacs, Ralf Angeli, 2006/12/29
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, David Kastrup, 2006/12/27
Re: gnu vs. xemacs, insert name, 2006/12/28