[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?
|
From: |
Will Parsons |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot? |
|
Date: |
11 May 2007 17:24:37 GMT |
|
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.7.1 (Win32) |
Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> unresponsive for a couple of minutes after. (This is using tramp with ftp.)
>
> I.e. you're actually using ange-ftp (via Tramp).
> Which `ftp' executable are you using?
The regular one that comes with Windows XP.
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/12
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/07
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Ralf Angeli, 2007/05/07
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/05/07
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Will Parsons, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Stefan Monnier, 2007/05/11
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?,
Will Parsons <=
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Hadron, 2007/05/04
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Sebastian Tennant, 2007/05/04
- Message not available
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, David Kastrup, 2007/05/04
- Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Xavier Maillard, 2007/05/05
Message not available
Re: Emacs 21 or snapshot?, Mark Woodward, 2007/05/05