[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: planner or org or ...
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: planner or org or ... |
Date: |
Sun, 27 May 2007 23:45:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.51.1 on GNU/Linux |
----- Tim X (2007-05-27) wrote:-----
> So, I think that while the functionality is similar, the underlying
> philosophy is a bit different and they approach things from a
> different perspective re: planning and organising your work. On some
> levels, it is a bit like a comparison of vi and emacs - both can
> achieve the same outcomes, but do it differently and one way suits
> some people while another way suits others. My main bias towards
> planner mode is probably a simple as it being the first mode of this
> type I used under emacs and it has set my expectations.
The difference is: org is the Emacs of organizers. Planner is an
organizer.
org let you create your own way of GTD. Planner creates a way of GTD for
you.
I don't get it. In what org is more complicated than planner. I
feel the contrary. Planner lets you create your *own* GTD too.
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org