[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Curiostiy question re: keybinding ??
From: |
Nikolaj Schumacher |
Subject: |
Re: Curiostiy question re: keybinding ?? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:51:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (darwin) |
William Case <billlinux@rogers.com> wrote:
> It would be hard to remember what the numbers mean with out some
> comments or a lot of memorization.
Don't bother with it. Use describe-key and describe-function to look up
keys, if you dynamically bind the keys. If you define them by hand (or
by text rather), use whatever you can read best.
> Is the first line binding style going out of use (replaced by the kbd
> keyword) or coming in? What would be the ^C (Ctrl) equivalent for Meta
> -- ^M; and, Super -- ^s; and, Shift -- ^,? What about Fx keys and
> others?
Actually I don't think it ever was in style. The most common way I
probably is "\C-c\M-c\S-e"\, etc. Not everything can be expressed like
that, though. Using kbd is more powerful, but only the numerical form
is complete, as some special keys (say multimedia keys...) haven't been
assigned a name.
Check out http://tiny-tools.sourceforge.net/emacs-keys.html as well.
regards,
Nikolaj Schumacher