[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why emacs have not native language menu
From: |
Alexey Pustyntsev |
Subject: |
Re: Why emacs have not native language menu |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2007 21:38:35 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 Emacs/22.0.95.1 |
Jean-Christophe Helary <fusion@mx6.tiki.ne.jp> writes:
> No they don't. Code is just arbitrary strings that mean only what the
> manual (in whatever language it is written) says they mean.
I don't think I agree. They need to understand the code, needn't they?
>
> Confusing code (that looks like English words) and English is the
> biggest mistake people make when learning computer languages. And it
> seems like some members of this list have yet to make the difference
> between emacs "function-name" that looks like English and plain
> English.
People created programming languages using a language spoken by human
beings. I think, you see why. Historically, programming languages
were based on English, which, in my opinion, is a good choice.
> Very good. You know enough English to find your way in emacs. Reverse
> question: is emacs the reason why you learned English ? Is emacs the
> only activity that involves your using English ? Is programming so ?
As a programmer I need English to work with information. I can hardly
imagine my job without the use of English. In most cases, it's just
safer to read an article/book in English than, as it's been correctly
noted, be fooled by a bad translation that is (frequently) done by
non-programmers.
>
> Can you imagine contexts where emacs can be used in a linguistically
> "neutral" environment ?
>
> Can you imagine that using emacs in this linguistically "neutral"
> environment would benefit from actual native linguistic information ?
>
> If you can't imagine that then you are right: you should focus on
> other issues.
I think creation of a "neutral environment" is a waste of time
as we all can use the environment that's already been created. That
is why I focus on other issues. You are right.
>
>
> Jean-Christophe Helary
>
> ps: did it ever occur to you that some massively succesful
> programming languages originated from non-English cultural/linguistic
> environments ?
That may suggest that English as a basis for a programming language is
probably a better choice.
--
Rgds
Alexey
Today is Sweetmorn, the 60th day of Confusion in the YOLD 3173
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, (continued)
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Stefan Monnier, 2007/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2007/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Pascal Bourguignon, 2007/07/24
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Alexey Pustyntsev, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu,
Alexey Pustyntsev <=
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, William Case, 2007/07/25
- Message not available
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, David Kastrup, 2007/07/27
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Dmitri Minaev, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Alexey Pustyntsev, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Dmitri Minaev, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Alexey Pustyntsev, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Dmitri Minaev, 2007/07/26
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Peter Dyballa, 2007/07/25
- Re: Why emacs have not native language menu, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/07/25