Re: code completion

[Óscar Fuentes]

Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:

>>> 1) Parsing speed -- Parsing in elisp is sloooow for large files. Maybe we
>>> need a real semantic-parser written in C or some other fast language.
>>
>> This looks like a good candidate:
>>
>> http://www.gccxml.org/
>
> Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C?

Last time I checked, gccxml didn't need a full XML parser.

Anyways, parsing XML is faster and *simpler* than parsing C++ (and
parsing gccxml output may be faster and simpler than parsing C too).

-- 
Oscar