[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: code completion
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: code completion |
Date: |
Thu, 13 Mar 2008 01:14:28 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) |
Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org> writes:
> Lennart Borgman (gmail) wrote:
>> But parsing xml can't be as fast as just reading elisp code, or? But
>> maybe the speed difference would be negligable, I do not know.
>
> I just did some unscientific testing, and the lisp xml parser we have
> now seems to parse at about 700kB/s on my machine. How large is the
> output that would need to be parsed?
IIRC, parsing the headers of Qt 3.x spitted approx. 8 MB of XML when I
played with gccxml some years ago.
--
Oscar
- Re: code completion, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: code completion, Arne Schmitz, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Óscar Fuentes, 2008/03/12
- Message not available
- Re: code completion, Pascal Bourguignon, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Óscar Fuentes, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Tom Tromey, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Tom Tromey, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Jason Rumney, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion,
Óscar Fuentes <=
- Message not available
- Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/11
- Re: code completion, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/03/12
- Message not available
- Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Bastien Guerry, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Bastien, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Bastien Guerry, 2008/03/12
- Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/12