[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell
|
From: |
Richard G Riley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell |
|
Date: |
Sun, 30 Mar 2008 10:54:04 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Tim X <timx@nospam.dev.null> writes:
>
> eshell is not a good replacement for shell scripts, so if your someone
> who writes lots of shell scripts, eshell isn't going to be a replacement
> for bash.
>
> Tim
What PATH variable does eshell use? It doesn't seem to use my normal
debian PATH which includes ~/bin. It doesn't seem to use exec-path and I
found no reference in the info file.
- Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Lorenzo Isella, 2008/03/29
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Will Parsons, 2008/03/29
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Tim X, 2008/03/30
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Pavol Murin, 2008/03/30
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Mathias Dahl, 2008/03/30
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Christian Herenz, 2008/03/31
- Re: Reasons for Switching to Eshell, Michael Albinus, 2008/03/31