[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: basic question: going back to dired
From: |
Bastien Guerry |
Subject: |
Re: basic question: going back to dired |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:26:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Xah <xahlee@gmail.com> writes:
> I don't think its a good idea to teach or insist that people adopt
> emacs's terminologies.
Adopting Emacs terminology is not good per se, it's good because it
helps people adopt Emacs.
> In particular, the term buffer is unsuitable and outdated. See the
> following argument:
You're arguing like a lawyer: since you cannot change the law itself,
you're just trying to change the spirit of the law.
Please improve Emacs if you want to, it will be more constructive than
trying to change the "spirit" behind Emacs...
--
Bastien
- basic question: going back to dired, Ben Aurel, 2008/07/21
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien, 2008/07/21
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Xah, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired,
Bastien Guerry <=
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien Guerry, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien Guerry, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Bastien Guerry, 2008/07/22
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Miles Bader, 2008/07/24
- Message not available
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Evans Winner, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/07/22
- Re: basic question: going back to dired, Tim X, 2008/07/23