Re: conditionals in elisp

[LanX]

> In any case, either *scratch* or an Emacs-Lisp buffer is generally better than
> `M-:' for extended experimenting, because, as Thi said, you can see the input

I'm wondering why nobody mentions M-x ielm for experimenting?

It just needs a setting the arrow movements to history-navigation
(i.e. swapping <C-up> and <up>) and it gets look and feel of  a
"normal" REPL-shell.

Very beginner friendly!

Cheers
  Rolf