Re: conditionals in elisp

[Harry Putnam]

LanX <lanx.perl@googlemail.com> writes:

>> In any case, either *scratch* or an Emacs-Lisp buffer is generally better 
>> than
>> `M-:' for extended experimenting, because, as Thi said, you can see the input
>
> I'm wondering why nobody mentions M-x ielm for experimenting?
>
> It just needs a setting the arrow movements to history-navigation
> (i.e. swapping <C-up> and <up>) and it gets look and feel of  a
> "normal" REPL-shell.
>
> Very beginner friendly!

Well, there's something I didn't even know existed... thanks.