Re: emacs build broken?

[rustom]

On Jan 29, 9:50 am, rustom <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jan 28, 1:50 pm, José A. Romero L. <escherdra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > (...)
>
> > Didn't emacs move to bazaar for good? (http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/
> > BzrForEmacsDevs)
> (...)
> If we stuck around with things like cvs a bit longer the other part of
> the acronym will also become true (GNU = Generally Not Used)
> He also (seehttp://johnbokma.com/mexit/2008/04/16/)

Ok so

http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/lh/emacs/trunk/files

seems broken

I wonder which is worse and antediluvian cvs or a broken bzr?