[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: line-move-visual
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: line-move-visual |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:12:19 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> The byte-compiler already warns about uses of next-line because it
> rarely makes sense to use next-line in lisp code anyway (forward-line is
> usually more appropriate, especially for parsing). So it's very likely
> that the remaining occurrences have been inspected by developers very
> carefully.
Not sure about "very" since we've had some bug reports after the
warnings were fixed, but yes. BTW my grep only finds 22 occurrences
(in Emacs trunk rather 23.2, but the difference should be small).
Stefan
- Re: line-move-visual, (continued)
- Re: line-move-visual, Mark Crispin, 2010/12/09
- Re: line-move-visual, Xah Lee, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, David Kastrup, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Alain Ketterlin, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: Wrong use of format=flowed antidote, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Joost Kremers, 2010/12/08
- Message not available
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Helmut Eller, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: line-move-visual, Tim X, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Andreas Politz, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, despen, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Tassilo Horn, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Uday S Reddy, 2010/12/08
- Re: line-move-visual, Evans Winner, 2010/12/09