[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: condition-case
From: |
Elena |
Subject: |
Re: condition-case |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Dec 2010 00:34:25 -0800 (PST) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Dec 8, 3:56 am, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com>
wrote:
> Ted Zlatanov <t...@lifelogs.com> writes:
> > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 15:43:29 -0500 Stefan Monnier
> > <monn...@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote:
>
> >>> I mean *today* why shouldn't `handler-case' be part of Emacs? Is there
> >>> anything blocking its inclusion in cl.el?
>
> > SM> I can't remember hearing of even a rumor of a patch to implement it.
> > SM> So, I guess that's the reason.
>
> > OK. So, given the source code Pascal posted, and assuming he assigns
> > the copyright, we could bring that into cl.el, right? Or will that not
> > work?
>
> There's no objection to assigning copyright to the FSF, I already did
> that for some other code.
Thank you Pascal. Are you/we talking about just "handler-case" or the
whole "pjb-cl.el"?
- Re: condition-case, (continued)
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/09
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/10
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/13
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/12/15
- Re: condition-case, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/16
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/08
- Re: condition-case,
Elena <=
- Re: condition-case, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2010/12/09