[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Ralf Fassel |
Subject: |
word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:31:36 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
I recently switched from 22.3 (opensuse 11.1) to emacs 23.1 (opensuse 11.3).
In emacs-22.3, a word containing german Umlauts was skipped as a whole
by forward-word/backward-word.
In emacs-23.1, a word containing german Umlauts is considered as three
parts by forward-word/backward-word.
E.g
Müller i.e. "\115\374\154\154\145\162" in Unibyte/Latin-9
Setting point before the 'M' and doing M-x forward-word ends up after
the 'r' in emacs-22 and after the 'M' in emacs-23.
The syntax entries for the Umlaut ü in emacs-23 explicitely says 'word',
so why does forward-word stop at the Umlaut?
emacs-23:
character: ü (252, #o374, #xfc)
preferred charset: eight-bit (Raw bytes 128-255)
code point: 0xFC
syntax: w which means: word
buffer code: #xFC
file code: #xFC
display: by display table entry [?ü] (see below)
The display table entry is displayed by these fonts (glyph codes):
ü:
x:-b&h-lucidatypewriter-medium-r-normal-sans-18-180-75-75-m-110-iso8859-1 (#xFC)
emacs-22:
character: ü (252, #o374, #xfc)
charset: eight-bit-graphic (8-bit graphic char (0xA0..0xFF))
code point: #xFC
syntax: w which means: word
buffer code: #xFC
file code: not encodable by coding system iso-latin-9
display: by display table entry [?ü] (see below)
The display table entry is displayed by these fonts (glyph codes):
ü: -B&H-LucidaTypewriter-Medium-R-Normal-Sans-18-180-75-75-M-110-ISO8859-1
(#xFC)
Any hints how to get the emacs-22 behaviour back?
R'
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Ralf Fassel <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09