[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Ralf Fassel |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:31:38 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
* Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
| Try to look at that file with "emacs -Q", to see if you can reproduce
| the problem there.
Same thing. I visit a file with 'über' (4 bytes/chars). This is
initially displayed as \374ber (the \374 being one entity).
Emacs now says:
character: \374 (252, #o374, #xfc)
preferred charset: eight-bit (Raw bytes 128-255)
code point: 0xFC
syntax: w which means: word
buffer code: #xFC
file code: #xFC
display: by this font (glyph code)
x:-sony-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-120-100-100-c-80-iso8859-1 (#xFC)
Then I go M-x set-language-environment Latin-9, and now it is displayed as
character: ü (252, #o374, #xfc)
preferred charset: eight-bit (Raw bytes 128-255)
code point: 0xFC
syntax: w which means: word
buffer code: #xFC
file code: #xFC
display: by display table entry [?ü] (see below)
The display table entry is displayed by these fonts (glyph codes):
ü: x:-sony-fixed-medium-r-normal--16-120-100-100-c-80-iso8859-1 (#xFC)
And word-movement still stops at the \374 (which looks perfectly like an
u-umlaut to me) despite of the 'word'-syntax in both cases.
| PS: maybe you're using Emacs in unibyte mode, which was a bad idea in
| Emacs-22, is deprecated in Emacs-23 and won't exist any more in
| Emacs-24.
I use unibyte in regular use.
I tried to understand all that hassle with encodings and buffer-write-
and read stuff, but didn't really grok it. I just want my old latin-1
unibyte files stay latin-1 unibyte when I save them, and not helpfully
converted to utf-whatever... Some of us use xemacs and some emacs (and
some kwrite and some even notepad) on the same files which does not
simplify things either...
R'
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Ralf Fassel <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09