Re: c/c++ project management and debugging

[Elena]

On Dec 23, 12:45 am, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com>
wrote:
> Richard Riley <rile...@googlemail.com> writes:
> > "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com> writes:
>
> >> Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >>> That's the problem: every Emacs power user seems to be chasing this
> >>> holy grail of a greatly customized Emacs, but I have yet to see a
> >>> customized Emacs matching a customized IDE.
>
> >> IDE are not customizable.
>
> > Huh?
>
> > Of course they are.
>
> Close to none, compared to emacs.  The main problem is that they either
> propose a fixed set of options ("preferences"), or if they propose a
> "programming" language, it's a half-backed proprietary languages, often
> not even Turing-complete.

False.  IDE plugins are developed in Turing-complete languages, thus
they can do whatever they please.  The scripting language embedded in
most IDEs is just for less-demanding tasks.