help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: c/c++ project management and debugging


From: Pascal J. Bourguignon
Subject: Re: c/c++ project management and debugging
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:38:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)

Elena <egarrulo@gmail.com> writes:

> On Dec 23, 12:45 am, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com>
> wrote:
>> Richard Riley <rile...@googlemail.com> writes:
>> > "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com> writes:
>>
>> >> Elena <egarr...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >>> That's the problem: every Emacs power user seems to be chasing this
>> >>> holy grail of a greatly customized Emacs, but I have yet to see a
>> >>> customized Emacs matching a customized IDE.
>>
>> >> IDE are not customizable.
>>
>> > Huh?
>>
>> > Of course they are.
>>
>> Close to none, compared to emacs.  The main problem is that they either
>> propose a fixed set of options ("preferences"), or if they propose a
>> "programming" language, it's a half-backed proprietary languages, often
>> not even Turing-complete.
>
> False.  IDE plugins are developed in Turing-complete languages, thus
> they can do whatever they please.  The scripting language embedded in
> most IDEs is just for less-demanding tasks.

Not to mention that sometimes, the customization part of the IDE, is
sold as a separate products, with separate license tokens, and therefore
you are not necessarily able to use it as routinely as the main, frozen
IDE.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]