RE: one shortcut next occurrence search

[Drew Adams]

> I didn't know about the "C-h b".  What's the difference?  Why I have
> to type "C-c C-h", "C-x C-h", etc. but "C-s C-h" does not work whilst
> "C-s C-h b" does?

Someone(TM)'s infinite wisdom.  See my earlier message.

> Funnily enough, according to "C-h c", "C-c C-h" and "C-x C-h" are not
> bound to anything, neither is "C-h" alone (it is a prefix key).

Yes, things like `C-c' are sometimes handled specially to get the `C-h'
behavior.  `C-h' does not show up on the keymap (which in the case of `C-c' is
`mode-specific-map').  Try `C-h M-k' and you will see.