[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Official Git mirror?
From: |
Giorgos Keramidas |
Subject: |
Re: Official Git mirror? |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:16:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:33:23 +0200, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
> Sometimes it indeed makes no significant difference, but sometimes it
> wins big time. Observe:
>
> bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk
>
> real 45m4.820s
> user 15m58.380s
> sys 0m12.910s
>
> Transferred: 540480KiB (199.9K/s r:540403K w:77K)
>
> bzr branch nosmart+bzr://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/emacs/trunk
>
>
> real 16m30.189s
> user 15m22.090s
> sys 0m14.560s
>
> Transferred: 780914KiB (789.2K/s r:780640K w:275K)
I started a new 'bzr branch' this morning, when I got to the office,
using the nosmart option. It's been running for more than an hour now,
it has transferred 500 MB of data, and all this on a laptop running
Ubuntu 10.10 LTS with ample free disk space and connected to the very
fast internal network of Google.
This is a *lot* of data for something that is supposed to fetch only the
trunk of Emacs. It took 3989.501 real / 581.270 user / 15.990 sys
seconds to fetch everything and the resulting .bzr/ directory contains
233 MB of data:
gkeramidas@gkeramidas-glaptop:~/bzr/trunk$ du -sh .bzr/
233M .bzr/
This is not very fast, but I'll keep using the bzr branch to see how
future updates go.
- Re: Official Git mirror?, (continued)
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Óscar Fuentes, 2011/02/21
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/21
- Message not available
- Re: Official Git mirror?,
Giorgos Keramidas <=
- Re: Official Git mirror?, Eli Zaretskii, 2011/02/23
- Re: Official Git mirror?, jun yu, 2011/02/23