Cthun-bot discussion

[TheFlyingDutchman]

On Mar 1, 3:43 pm, Cthun <cthun_...@qmail.net.au> wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 5:51 PM, TheFlyingDutchman wrote:
>
> > On Mar 1, 5:52 am, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>  wrote:
> >> On 01/03/2011 4:27 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> >>> Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>    writes:
>
> >>>> What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do
> >>>> with Lisp, Kastrup? It is well known that it is all-caps languages
> >>>> like COBOL and BASIC that cause brain damage, Kastrup.
>
> >>> Today's Common Lisp is just as case insensitive as those.
>
> >> Except that it's not called "COMMON LISP", Kastrup.
>
> > Because it is not an acronymn, Cthun.
>
> What does that have to do with emacs, Dutchman?

Why did the Cthun-bot talk about COMMON LISP and then revert to emacs?
Are they doing any testing at all?

> The languages whose names are in all caps seem to be the ones that cause
> brain damage, Dutchman, and Common Lisp is not among them.

It is always refreshing when the Cthun-bot can spit out a sentence
that differs from it's normal small set, even if it doesn't make any
sense.