[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0
|
From: |
rusi |
|
Subject: |
Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0 |
|
Date: |
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 07:37:40 -0800 (PST) |
|
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Mar 3, 2:02 pm, "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <p...@informatimago.com>
wrote:
> Well, I understand reticence of RMS to use a language that's not even
> standardized yet. Of course, I shall then wonder why he had to design
> his own non-standardized language.
Reticence??
I guess you mean hesitation/reluctance or some such? If you are
actually saying 'reticence' that's a cute usage given how much rms is
participating in these discussions :-)
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2011/03/01
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, rusi, 2011/03/01
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Barry Margolin, 2011/03/02
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, rusi, 2011/03/02
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2011/03/02
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Barry Margolin, 2011/03/02
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2011/03/03
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0,
rusi <=
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2011/03/03
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Barry Margolin, 2011/03/03
- RE: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Drew Adams, 2011/03/03
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2011/03/04
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, David Kastrup, 2011/03/04
- Re: print out all members of a list, v.1.0, Barry Margolin, 2011/03/04