|
| From: | Pascal J. Bourguignon |
| Subject: | Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle |
| Date: | Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:18:44 -0000 |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) |
Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> writes:
> What's the rationale for providing them? Are the definitions
> obvious for collections that a not sets?
The rational is to prove that Xah is dumb.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |