[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs modernization, 2012
From: |
Xah Lee |
Subject: |
Re: emacs modernization, 2012 |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2012 19:34:01 -0000 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Feb 28, 9:03 am, Peter Davis <Peter.Da...@mathworks.com> wrote:
> On 2/28/2012 11:35 AM, Dan Espen wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ever hear of ergo-emacs?
> > That's Xah's presentation.
> > I think he has more than a few users.
>
> I looked at the ErgoEmacs pages a bit. I can see a good case for why
> Notepad users should switch. I didn't see a compelling reason why
> existing proficient Emacs users would want to switch to this.
>
> There's also Aquamacs on the Mac ... a pretty good attempt (IMO) to
> integrate Emacs with Mac UI conventions.
hi Peter,
the key is to get FSF GNU Emacs to endorse, adopt, this.
else, it's just third party mod, and ZXCV always come with stigma in
the emacs culture.
Xah
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012,
Xah Lee <=
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Xah Lee, 2012/03/28
- Re: emacs modernization, 2012, Stefan Monnier, 2012/03/28