Re: moving in js

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 09.08.2012 17:04, schrieb João Távora:
> > also seen from usage, that command should never fail, unless beginning or
> > end of buffers are reached.
>
> I don't understand this part. Why should it not fail?

Well, that's a matter of taste maybe. IMO expression have the part of words in 
natural language.
Not exactly, as common words don't nest, but similar. Will you ever get an error from 
"forward-word" unless at the EOB?

 In your opinion,
> what is backward-sexp suppose to do on its second invocation in a lisp-mode
> buffer containing
>
> (foo (bar baz) quux)
>
> with the cursor in the innermost list between "bar" and "baz"??

it would reach the beginning of the innermost list, "(bar"

a second invocation would reach "foo"