[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Tom |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Oct 2012 14:55:19 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jai Dayal <dayalsoap <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> Isn't this for Vim????
Originally it is, but the frontend is separated from the backend,
so any editor can implement a frontend for it.
Here's the emacs frontend:
https://github.com/senny/emacs-eclim
It is quite usable, especially for Java, but it does not implement
all the features of eclim, so it can even be better if people
help out.
The emacs-eclim authors welcome contributions, see the bottom of
the page at the above link.
Here are the full list of eclim features from which only the Java-related
things are implemented in emacs and not all of those either, so those who
know elisp can help making emacs-eclim better:
http://eclim.org/features.html
- Re: IDE versus emacs, (continued)
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Bob Proulx, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tima, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Steinar Bang, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Drew Adams, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Sohail Somani, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/19
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Tom, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Tom <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/20
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/19
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/06
- RE: IDE versus emacs, Doug Lewan, 2012/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Vagn Johansen, 2012/10/06
Re: IDE versus emacs, Ken Goldman, 2012/10/05