Re: migrating from ido to icicles

[Michael Heerdegen]

"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:

> Long ago Icicles used TAB and S-TAB only for completion, not also for
> cycling as now.  If there were a demand for this it could be optional,
> but today it is not.

I agree something like the proposed behavior would be handy.  I think I
would like it, too.

> If you want that behavior, replace
> `icicle-next-(prefix|apropos)-complete-cycles-p' with `nil' wherever its
> value is used in `icicles-mcmd.el'.  (You still do have other keys that
> perform only cycling.)

If it is that easy, why don't we do this in the code and make the
behavior optional?


Regards,

Michael.