Re: Reverting but keeping undo

[Michael Heerdegen]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

> > I wonder how that works.
>
> The revert is considered as a change like any other.  I.e. the first
> undo step simply undoes the buffer modifications introduced by the
> revert.

That sounds good, thanks.

I wonder, however, if the user will notice when he passes that point
while successively undoing.  I.e., for the case the user doesn't want to
undo prior reverts, maybe there could be some kind of warning in the
minibuffer.


Regards,

Michael.