Re: How to know is a buffer is a temporary one?

[Sebastien Vauban]

Stefan Monnier wrote:
>> Why are you saying that that version somehow better is?
>
> It eliminates a redundancy (the two calls to `message' are reduced to one),

I did not catch that!

> and it uses the same test as is used elsewhere in Emacs ("buffer name starts
> with a space" is used for example to hide buffers in completion or to decide
> whether buffer-undo-list should be initially set to nil or the t).

OK, good reasons... Thanks for explaining!

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban