[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:53:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ken Goldman <kgoldman@us.ibm.com> writes:
> People don't search for emacs because it already comes with
> Linux distros. One has to download Eclipse.
Is Eclipse even a GP editor, isn't it just a lousy IDE for the
equally-lousy Java?
All this talk about the alternatives to Emacs and Vim, makes me
even more firm in my conviction that there are no alternatives to
Emacs and Vim.
Remember, if there is nothing to see in a bottomless pit, you
can't change that be squeezing your eyes.
--
Emanuel Berg - programmer (hire me! CV below)
computer projects: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
internet activity: http://home.student.uu.se/embe8573
- Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto, 2013/08/26
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Perry Smith, 2013/08/26
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Peter Dyballa, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Suvayu Ali, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Ken Goldman, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/28
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, W. Greenhouse, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/08/29