[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
henry atting |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:24:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> [...]
> The only group that I see a small hope for are
> professional writers, translators, and such. I don't
> know how they typically do their stuff, but I think they
> would *love* Emacs!
Oh yes, I'm a writer and I use emacs only. Since writing, art in
general, ought to be free I would not let some proprietary behemoth
handle my words. If the group of emacs users would melt down to a
handfull of steadfest people I'd be happily one of these. :)
henry
--
web: http://literaturlatenight.de
jabberID: atting@jabber.at
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/10/11
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/11
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Tom Davey, 2013/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
henry atting <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eric Abrahamsen, 2013/10/11
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/04
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/08
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12