[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Eric Abrahamsen |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 07:19:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> Bob Proulx <bob@proulx.com> writes:
>
> The only group that I see a small hope for are
> professional writers, translators, and such. I don't
> know how they typically do their stuff, but I think they
> would *love* Emacs!
I'm a writer *and* a translator, and I do everything in Emacs.
Specifically, I do all my writing in org mode, which is shaping up to be
something like Emacs' "killer app," if that concept applies. I think org
mode is doing quite a bit to draw in new users, particularly those who
don't necessarily count as "real" programmers.
E
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/10/11
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/11
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Tom Davey, 2013/10/09
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, henry atting, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Eric Abrahamsen <=
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/04
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/08
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12