[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Phillip Lord |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Oct 2013 12:06:54 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Rainer M Krug <Rainer@krugs.de> writes:
>> The other point to remember is that there are more programmers now than
>> 20 years ago. I would be shocked if Emacs popularity as a percentage had
>> not dropped.
>
> Not only more programmers, but also more IDE, source code editors (in
> the widest sense) - i.e. alternatives to emacs.
>
> I love emacs and will stick with it (even if I am the last one using
> it), but I see the difficulty to sell it to new programmers. By the way:
> I see the same problem with vi.
Sure. It has a start up hump. I basically bullied some of my students
into using it; it takes a few months before they start to appreciate it.
But, as I say, there are more programmers than ever; I suspect that
actual number of Emacs users is increasing. Especially since org-mode
got invented which is bringing in lots of people.
Phil
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, (continued)
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Evans Winner, 2013/10/06
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/09
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Teemu Likonen, 2013/10/10
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Bob Proulx, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/10/11
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rainer M Krug, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Peter Dyballa, 2013/10/10
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Phillip Lord <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Christopher Ritsen, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Stefan Monnier, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Christopher Ritsen, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Phillip Lord, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/14
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Bob Proulx, 2013/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/15
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/10/16