[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Oct 2013 14:14:27 -0700 (PDT) |
> > > > trust Emacs to be active and improving by 2018?
> >
> > > Emacs was written in 1985, so it will be 30 years old soon. I
> > > think it can go on another 30 years :-)
> >
> > It's really more like 40 years that people have been using Emacs.
> > GNU Emacs will be 30 in two more years (soon, but not that soon).
>
> Yes, yes. Not good. I was thinking of GNU Emacs but didn't say it.
No, no. Good! Your point was that Emacs has been around a long
time and will likely be around for a long time to come. Thank you
for saying it, Kai. What I wrote just nitpicked to add a few details.
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Drew Adams, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Grossjohann, 2013/10/12
- RE: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/12
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Kai Großjohann, 2013/10/13
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/10/13
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eric Brown, 2013/10/13