[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations
From: |
Peter Dyballa |
Subject: |
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Nov 2013 22:00:14 +0100 |
Am 25.11.2013 um 20:31 schrieb ian.tegebo:
> Has anyone already come up with a name for large customizations? I've
> noticed a number of efforts to significantly customize Emacs in a way that
> other people can readily use. The first term that came to mind was "flavor",
> as it seems to largely be a matter of taste.
On second thoughts I think that "romper suit" could be a splendid choice.
There are voices that call GNU Emacs being old. (Ridiculous!)
All the time missing documentation is detected. (Comes from hiding private
parts in public.)
Particularly in German "romper suit" (meaning a suit to struggle or kick about)
has a hidden connotation: It seems to motivate younger ones to try to escape
it… (There exists a similar and clean white suit for a particular sort of
residents. And might be possible that some customisation escapes that "large
customization".)
It adds to the use of GNU Emacs specific terms. (Frame, window, buffer, mode
line, point, …)
--
Greetings
Pete
We have to expect it, otherwise we would be surprised.
Message not available
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Peter Dyballa, 2013/11/25
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/25
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/25
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2013/11/26
Message not available
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations,
Peter Dyballa <=
Message not available
Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/28
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/28
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Rustom Mody, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/29
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Jambunathan K, 2013/11/30
- Message not available
- Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations, Emanuel Berg, 2013/11/30