Re: RFC: Flavors - naming significant sets of customizations

[Emanuel Berg]

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> These are the lists that I read
>
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.sources
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.devel
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.announce
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.cedet
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.gnus.user
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.orgmode
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.bugs
>          0: nntp+news.gmane.org:gmane.emacs.help

Wow, that's a lot to digest!

No, I never understood this "gmane" thing. Is
gmane.emacs.help not the same as gnu.emacs.help - or is
it just a matter of distribution and/or interface?

It sounds as if it could be some twist on Gmail - like
Postscript and ghostscript, modify and mogrify, etc.

I'll try to add some of those groups right now, hang
on...

-- 
Emanuel Berg, programmer-for-rent. CV, projects, etc at uXu
underground experts united:  http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573