Re: changing from \cite{1} to \cite{MacRae,2002}

[Emanuel Berg]

Sharon Kimble <boudiccas@skimble.plus.com> writes:

> Wrong! I don't know of any "man" called Sharon! :)

The specialist doesn't make silly mistakes like
that. Here, "man" refers to "hu*man*" - just think of
it, otherwise you wouldn't even be allowed to read the
man pages. Mano a mano!

> Your references appear in the text as numbers,
> i.e. [1] which is not what I'm after. I'm looking for
> "author/editor, year".

OK, but in principle, it should be the same. Also, the
[1] is the scientific standard these days in my part of
the world, at least. And as you saw in the example I
provided, it can carry surplus information - pages, as
in the example - but: how to add what you seek (by
default) I don't know, but keep digging because that is
something that is 100% possible to automatize with
minimal effort and it should already be implemented, no
doubt.

-- 
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573