[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RTF for emacs
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: RTF for emacs |
Date: |
Sun, 25 May 2014 08:51:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes:
> So currently I am torn between: On the one hand
> xelatex does not work, classic latex works On the
> other this is freakin 2014 do we still stay in 1980
> and write \alpha \beta \gamma \delta ... \omega and
> \sum and \forall when we can directly write α β γ δ …
> ω ∑ ∀ ??
I think \alpha is better. I can't see those other chars
for starters and I'd like to be sure everyone see what
I write. Also, how did you insert them? ("\alpha" takes
zero time to type.)
Only with complicated formulas it might make sense to
have the Greek alphabet as it is - I can't say for the
mathematicians or the HPC professionals or whatever...
> Note Haskell can already do ≠ instead of /= Likewise
> ∧ ∨ instead of ugly and obsolete && ||
No way, ugly and obsolete! There will always be more
excellent C (with !='s) around than ever purist and
neurotic Haskell. But to each his own. (By the way,
some of those chars I cannot see as well.)
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- Re: artist-mode/aa2u, (continued)
- Re: RTF for emacs, Glyn Millington, 2014/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/24
- Re: RTF for emacs, Grant Rettke, 2014/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/24
- Re: RTF for emacs, Rusi, 2014/05/24
- Re: RTF for emacs,
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: RTF for emacs, Yuri Khan, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Grant Rettke, 2014/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, Yuri Khan, 2014/05/25
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/25
- Re: RTF for emacs, James Freer, 2014/05/24
- Message not available
- Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/24
Re: RTF for emacs, Hans BKK, 2014/05/21
Re: RTF for emacs, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/23