[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: confusion with defining keys
From: |
lee |
Subject: |
Re: confusion with defining keys |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 07:40:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> (global-set-key "\C-ä" 'undo)
>
> This should ideally signal an error, because "\C-ä" is an invalid string
> (a string can only contains chars and C-ä is not a char but
> a "char combined with a modifier"). For historical reasons this doesn't
> signal an error, but it doesn't do what you want. Use either (kbd
> "C-ä") or [?\C-ä].
> In general, I recommend never to use the plain "..." notation for key
> sequences: it made sense back in the Emacs-18 days when it was
> introduced, but it's been a "legacy" since Emacs-19.
Hm, I think I tried (kbd "<C-ä>"), which didn't work. How is one
supposed to know what to use? I'd never think of [?\C-ä] ...
--
Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
- confusion with defining keys, lee, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Nicolas Richard, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys,
lee <=
- Re: confusion with defining keys, kastian, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/11
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/11
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/12
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Stefan Monnier, 2014/06/12
- Message not available
- Re: confusion with defining keys, Emanuel Berg, 2014/06/12