Re: strange display of glyphs in a second window

[François Patte]

Le 26/06/2014 04:47, Eli Zaretskii a écrit :
>> From: François Patte <francois.patte@mi.parisdescartes.fr>
>> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 23:12:33 +0200
>>
>> < Either way, somehow you are forcing on
>>> all frames but the initial one a font that doesn't have glyphs for
>>> some characters,
>>
>> Absolutely no problems for displaying glyphs in the initial
>> frame....
> 
> 
> Yes, that's what I said.
> 
> What does "C-u C-x =" say in the second frame about the font used to
> display the characters that are displayed correctly?
> 
> 

If I open the new frame with the same text in both frames, I get for the
same letter:

in the first frame
x:-adobe-courier-medium-r-normal--24-240-75-75-m-150-iso8859-1 (#x64)

in the second frame:
xft:-unknown-FreeMono-normal-normal-normal-*-24-*-*-*-m-0-iso10646-1 (#x45)


More strange: there is an interaction with latex commands; for instance,
{\bfseries some text} is "normal" in the first frame, while it is
displayed as a code point for each character (including spaces and line
feed (C-j)) in the second frame...

Italicized text {\itshape some text} is italicized in yellow color in
the first frame  (which the normal behaviour) while it is in upright
character underlined and yellow in the second frame...

I use Auctex; there might be some interaction between Auctex and Emacs....



-- 
François Patte
Université Paris Descartes