[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Always using let*
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: Always using let* |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:09:14 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) |
> You mean "let, and not let*?" Because I use let all the
> time and I don't think that is uncommon.
No, I don't think I made a typo: you could remove `let' from Elisp and
it would be pretty easy to rewrite all the code to use let* instead.
In 99% of the cases it's just a matter of adding a *.
Stefan
- Re: Always using let*, (continued)
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/15
- Re: Always using let*, Cecil Westerhof, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Cecil Westerhof, 2014/09/18
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/18
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, sokobania . 01, 2014/09/16
- RE: Always using let*, Drew Adams, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Message not available
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
- Re: Always using let*,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: Always using let*, Emanuel Berg, 2014/09/16
Re: Always using let*, Joe Fineman, 2014/09/14
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: Always using let*, Stefan Monnier, 2014/09/14