Re: Always using let*

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> You mean "let, and not let*?" Because I use let all
>> the time and I don't think that is uncommon.
>
> No, I don't think I made a typo: you could remove
> `let' from Elisp and it would be pretty easy to
> rewrite all the code to use let* instead. In 99% of
> the cases it's just a matter of adding a *.

Yes, that's what I mean, you mean, let and only let
(i.e., not let*), because let's functionality is
covered by let* as well.

-- 
underground experts united