Re: evidence: nano(1) is *NOT* better than Emacs

[Dan Espen]

Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:

> Dan Espen <despen@verizon.net> writes:
>
>> If you like the brighter higher contrast colors, I'd
>> agree Nano looks better.
>>
>> The colors are easily fixed.
>
> Yes, I know you can change the colors in Emacs :)
>
>> If you don't like 2 lines of your screen being taken
>> up by a display of shortcuts, Nano looses.
>
> Unfortunately not.
>
> Just because you can configure things in Emacs and
> spend a lifetime doing so doesn't mean other editors
> are completely unconfigurable. Try this:
>
>     nano --nohelp --morespace
>
> Damn! nano wins again!

Pardon my saying so, but that's ridiculous.

In the case of Emacs, you rule out any changes.
Then you make changes to Nano and claim victory.

-- 
Dan Espen