[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: syntax highlighting
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: syntax highlighting |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:23:46 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro wrote:
> Bob Proulx escreveu:
> > Hate proposing changing it since it will break anyone who has
> > followed directions.
>
> We don't have to change the interface to fix the problem. Just
> changing the dcoumentation's wording ("positive" to "non-negative")
> will be enough to make it straight and won't be any breakage.
I like it! All it needs is someone to push that upstream.
Bob
- Re: syntax highlighting, (continued)
- Re: syntax highlighting, M P, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/16
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, M P, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2014/11/16
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Stefan Monnier, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/17
- Re: syntax highlighting, Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro, 2014/11/18
- Re: syntax highlighting,
Bob Proulx <=
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
- Message not available
- Re: syntax highlighting, Emanuel Berg, 2014/11/17
Re: syntax highlighting, Robert Thorpe, 2014/11/16