[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency
|
From: |
Alexander Shukaev |
|
Subject: |
Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency |
|
Date: |
Tue, 16 Dec 2014 22:25:17 +0100 |
>
> Just consider when exactly the different parts of your macro are
> evaluated. When is something that is quoted in the definition evaluated?
> And when is something that is comma-escaped evaluated? Then look
> carefully at what is quoted and what is comma-escaped. You'll see that
> in the first version, something doesn't match.
If I would want to think more myself I would not ask for help. Could you
just explain if you know?
- Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Joost Kremers, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency,
Alexander Shukaev <=
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, John Mastro, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/16
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Nicolas Richard, 2014/12/17
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/17
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Stefan Monnier, 2014/12/17
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/17
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Nicolas Richard, 2014/12/17
- Re: Macro Expansion Inconsistency, Alexander Shukaev, 2014/12/17