[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: gnuplot
|
From: |
Javier Fernandez |
|
Subject: |
Re: gnuplot |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:11:21 +0000 (UTC) |
|
User-agent: |
tin/2.0.1-20111224 ("Achenvoir") (UNIX) (NetBSD/6.1.5 (amd64)) |
Perhaps I was a bit extreme in my examples before. Pine license was a bit
more restrictive since it didn't allow for distributing binary modified
works and pine was in debian/non-free.
My meaning was just that gnuplot license poses problems for forking.
Even if you can fork you need to distribute it in an annoying way.
- Re: gnuplot (was: Re: zsh outside of Emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2015/02/10
- Re: gnuplot, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/02/12
- Re: gnuplot, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/12
- Re: gnuplot, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/02/12
- Re: gnuplot, Marcin Borkowski, 2015/02/12
- Re: gnuplot, Stefan Monnier, 2015/02/12
- Message not available
- Re: gnuplot, Emanuel Berg, 2015/02/12
- Re: gnuplot, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2015/02/13