[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic flyspell
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Automatic flyspell |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:01:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Robert Thorpe <rt@robertthorpeconsulting.com> writes:
> Flyspell-prog-mode is supposed to check only
> comments and strings. I tried it in C mode just
> before writing my previous post and it seemed to
> only check the strings.
OK, I suspected that since there were two versions.
Yes, that's intelligent but perhaps a bit overkill. It
depends how many strings you have and how poor your
spelling is, I suppose. Unless it comes with a big
overhead it is nothing to worry about.
> In the post you quote though I was giving advice to
> someone who said they wanted flyspell everywhere.
Well, I just thought about it when I saw the
collective prog-mode-hook - you mean I should have
quoted it differently to make explicit the advice was
given to the OP and not you?
Yes, I think it is the right attitude to help people
even though you would have solved the problem in
another way (including degrading it from problem
status). That's what I try to do whenever I can but I
also don't have a problem adding a note what I think
on a larger scale. If I however only would give such
comments that would have been a bad attitude indeed.
--
underground experts united