Re: hooks, again

[Stefan Monnier]

> Nothing says just because you set the hook that way
> you cannot before you do that examine what is in the
> hook and function by function find out what they are
> and if you like them to be there.

> Usually there isn't much so it isn't a lot work
> either, and besides it is a limited but nonetheless
> good way to examine the system.

And what is it again that you gained from using (setq foo '(bla))
over (add-hook 'foo 'bla)?

> Again, what's stopping me adding those functions as
> well (with setq), if I like them?

You can reinvent add-hook, if you want, yes.
More power to you,


        Stefan