Re: Defining functions on the fly

[Alexis]

Tassilo Horn <tsdh@gnu.org> writes:

> But as Pascal already said, duplicating your function is not a 
> good idea.  Defining aliases is a bit better if you persist on 
> prefixed versions although I the only benefit I can see is a 
> slightly better discoverability through C-h f <prefix>-TAB.

Related: i created the snippet i pasted from `ewmctrl' so that 
when users do C-h m, they can read a helpfully-named function for 
a dynamically-generated keybinding, rather than "??".

i imagine there's probably a Better Way To Do It™, though. :-)


Alexis.